On Saturday, April 23, 2016 Utah State Delegates will assemble and make decisions on multi-county state legislative races as well as to elect the Republican nominee for Governor, Treasurer, federal races and to elect by acclamation others unopposed.
Foremost on everyone’s mind is who will be the national delegates that will represent Utah in Cleveland at the national convention in July to nominate the candidate for President.
This campaign season has drawn attention to the problem of the “Establishment” and its influence in the selection process. In an attempt to education national delegates and citizens who are wondering what happens and what they can do, Phyllis Schlafly wrote a book that vividly describes how King making works at these conventions. In A Choice Not An Echo, she reviews the history of these back room deals. It is MUST reading!
So does Utah have an establishment? And what does it mean? Great questions! The Establishment has been around a long time. Here’s what Thomas Jefferson said:
I join in your reprobation of our merchants, priests and lawyers for their adherence to England & monarchy in preference to their own country and it’s constitution. but merchants have no country. the mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. in every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. he is always in alliance with the Despot abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own. it is easier to acquire wealth and power by this combination than by deserving them: and to effect this they have perverted the purest religion ever preached to man, into mystery & jargon unintelligible to all mankind & therefore the safer engine for their purposes. with the lawyers it is a new thing. they have in the mother country been generally the firmest supporters of the free principles of their constitution. but there too they have changed.
Some things never change. Delegates have been asking me who the Establishment is in Utah. I wrote a post in 2015 and identified them. They are the same group that has funded and has tried to destroy Utah’s caucus system.
The very discussion about the RNC rules and how the Romney team stipulated that you had to have eight states (in order to keep Ron Paul out), now those rules don’t fit their plans to bring in a third candidate, dark horse.
Now they are trying to say, “Well, that doesn’t mean you have to get those eight state prior to the convention, you just have to get it AT the convention?”
I don’t care WHO you support. This is what the Establishment does. This is a deception. I have been in this party for a long time. My mission has always been to expose who these elites are. And so here it is:
[Disclaimer: I know and have worked with a few of these people. They each have value and are good people and have strengths I admire. But we must put that aside when it comes to policy setting, votes that will be cast and legislative representation.]
COUNT MY VOTE ESTABLISHMENT
These are the donors that have sought to destroy our republican form of government. Please read this blog post because I list the names and how much they have donated. You may be shocked. Some of them are running for national delegate. If you see any of these names DO NOT VOTE FOR THEM. Included on this DNV (Do Not Vote) list are these names and their family members:
- Rich MeKeown
- Mike Leavitt
- Kirk Jowers
- LaVarr Webb
- Orrin Hatch
- Thomas Wright
- Ann Wright Lampropoulos
DNV – Do not vote for the following candidates because they are receiving PAC donations from the CMV PAC through Mike Leavitt, Rich McKeown (Leavitt Group), Gail Miller. Here is the screen shot:
CMV is concerned that Weiler’s challenger, Heather Gardner, will be elected because she has run an effective campaign to support the caucus. Senator Weiler was censured in a State Central Committee for lying about the facts of the lawsuit in a series of Tweets.
Here are some screen shots of his distasteful Tweets to me, mocking me for raising funds for Marriage between a man and a woman as he helped LGBT constituents to undermine that institution. It was not easy raising enough money to file the amicus briefs in the 4th, 10th Circuits and at the U.S. Supreme Court.
I also also discovered that he and Ken Ivory deliberately tried to stop the nullification of the ACA (ObamaCare) by watering it down to a Prohibition of Medicaid Expansion. Then Senator Weiler tried to unsuccessfully undermine that substitute bill.
He was the sponsor of the CMV bill – SB 54, falsely called a “compromise.” It was no compromise. It was CMV. See my post.
Senator Shiozawa is an example of a very kind man (a church leader) that got elected while no one was looking. His score is worse than his Democratic colleagues.
SB 54-CMV MEMBERS OF THE UTAH LEGISLATURE
Here is the list of State Senators that supported SB 54, which is the same as CMV and the original proposal that DC lobbyists (including Kirk Jowers) who have supported the Democratic National Committee and who set up and managed Stephen Colbert’s SuperPAC to mock Republican candidates
Here is the list of the State Representatives that supported SB 54.
WHICH MEMBERS OF THE UTAH LEGISLATURE ARE GETTING PAC MONEY FROM CMV?
This is your DNV (Do Not Vote) list for State Legislators that are accepting funds from the CMV elite (this is a SCREEN SHOT!)
Todd Weiler was censured during a recent State Central Committee for Tweeting false information about the lawsuit, which damaged the case. He has a history on Twitter that has shown me he is not for Marriage between a man or a woman and is only a small portion of the abusive and mocking tweets he has sent out about me during a very difficult year of raising $100,000 to defend Marriage in the Courts.
Here is proof:
ELECTION OF A NEW NATIONAL COMMITTEEMAN AND WOMAN: A CMV COUP?
At approximately 4:55 PM on the filing deadline day for National Committeeman and woman, two establishment candidates filed. Those of us who are involved in the Party were told that the current Committeeman and woman, Bruce Hough and Enid Mickelson, were running again. In fact, even Party leadership were told just recently that they were not stepping down.
Without announcement, they both decided not to run and suddenly Thomas Wright and Ann Marie Lampropoulos, brother and sister (wife of Fred Lampropoulos of Merit Medical) stepped forward.
Because the Wrights (which would be a question of nepotism in the first place) are running unopposed, the party rules stipulate that they will be elected by acclamation. Why is this of any concern?
If you review my previous post about the Establishment and CMV=SB 54, you will notice that Merit Medical (the Lampropoulos’ company) donated $25,000 to destroy the caucus and to oppose the party’s position on the law suit – that CMV and SB 54 are unconstitutional.
The Party is in the Court on this matter. It is a serious issue of a First Amendment right to freely assemble and to define membership, rather than open it up to unaffiliated and render the caucus and convention a mere endorsement with little reason for any candidate to go through the process and be motivated to get to know us, the grassroots.
It is plausible to believe that there was coordination between the two candidates and the current Committeeman/woman.
I know from a previous poll I took of Republicans that Fred Lampropoulos, candidate Ann Marie’s husband, favors a fully OPEN PRIMARY. I also know that Enid Mickelson favors the 80% threshold, which would render the convention purposeless.
The RNC is Establishment-controlled. All the in-fighting going on over rules is a great concern. Both Bruce and Enid supported the rule change that created a favorable situation for Mitt Romney to control the delegates. Now, that same group is trying to manipulate the rule Romney wanted to keep the Ron Paul delegates out, by saying “Oh the candidate doesn’t need to carry 8 states into the convention. They can do that DURING the convention.” Seriously? Then WHY do we need all these Primaries? Why not just show up at the convention and influence the delegates there?
To have two people succeed these two new candidates that are the heirs apparent to the current Establishment Committeeman/woman that have actively worked, with their money and in the case of Thomas Wright, who fully supported SB 54, is objectionable.
Not only do the members of the RNC help raise money for the Party, they also set the rules for the national convention and they have a lot of power to manipulate those rules and who becomes the next president.
We don’t need any more games played at the RNC, which is Establishment-controlled.
This matter will be handled in a follow-up State Central Committee meeting to resolve.
[Ultimately, this problem is happening because we have allowed people to be elected that have departed from the U.S. Constitution and have perverted it with some amendments that have altered its original intent, which is why I am running for Presidential Elector. Read more about this topic in this post.]
Although the Establishment is gathered around Ted Cruz right now, remember where they started: JEB BUSH. Then MARCO RUBIO. Then KASICH. They will pull out all stops to get their Establishment goal and their elitist pick. That candidate profile does not respect the U.S. Constitution, states rights, and our borders. It does not regard the moral issues as winning and seeks to silence them. The Establishment, as in Thomas Jefferson’s words, has been selling out this nation to global interests for decades. We must return to the principles of the U.S. Constitution.
CRUZ OFFICIAL SLATE ESTABLISHMENT
I have consistently stated that ALL the candidates have Establishment consultants and figures seeded in their campaigns. For this, I’ve been on everyone’s most-disliked list. But I’m not here to be popular. I’m here to tell the truth on my radio show The Liberty Lineup on AM 630 KTKK 10-Noon Mountain time daily and also online or by smart phone app k talk radio.
So when the Utah Official Cruz slate came out, there they were. In fact, so alarming was it that two other slates emerged – a Leadership Slate and a Non-Establishment slate. The first is the Cruz campaign team. The second is not only members of the campaign team, but the grassroots that have worked hard to preserve the caucus and who also want to protect the platform – another role of a national delegate.
The Official Cruz slate Establishment include:
- Spencer Stokes
- Spencer Cox
- Gary Herbert
- Jeanette Herbert
- Casey Voeks
- David Clark
- Wayne Niederhauser
- Richard Snelgrove
- Marco Diaz
- Clair Ellis
It’s not a good idea to send people who will be “double-dipping” in their power. National Delegates should be grassroots and not elected officials. I will make ONE exception, and that is Mike Lee because, full disclosure, I do support Ted Cruz and without Mike’s endorsement, Ted would not be in the U.S. Senate. I don’t agree with all their votes, but they are the best we have in DC. So here are the elected officials that should step aside and allow grassroots to be elected as national delegates:
- Family members of elected officials
- Mia Love
- Rob Bishop
- Bill Lee
Here is the Non-Establishment slate. I’m so honored to have been invited to join this great group of Americans!